Fruit & herbal vs Tisana difesa e sostegno
Overall, Tisana difesa e sostegno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruit & herbal | Tisana difesa e sostegno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tisana difesa e sostegno has no calories, while Fruit & herbal has 28 kcal.
- Tisana difesa e sostegno has no sugar, while Fruit & herbal has 7 g.
- Tisana difesa e sostegno has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fruit & herbal
Not available.
Tisana difesa e sostegno
TISANA A BASE ECHINACEA, ROSA CANINA MORA, SAMBUCO ED ARONIA. INTEGRATORE ALIMENTARE - : Echinacea 30% (Echinacea angustifolia DC., erba) Rosa canina 29% (Rosa canina L, frutto). Rooibös 18% (Aspalathus linearis (Burm. f) R. Dahlgren, foglie), Mora 14% (Rubus fruticosus L.. frutto). Sambuco 4,5% (Sambucus nigraL., frutto), Aronia 3,5% (Aronia melanocarpa (Michaux.) S. Elliott, frutto), aroma naturale. Dichiarazione nutrizionale: per 100 ml: energia 0 kJ/O kcal, grassi 0g di cui acidi grassi saturi 0 g., carboidrati O g di cui zuccheri 0 g. fibre D g. proteine 0 g, sale D g. Da consumarsi preferibilmente entro fine: vedere parte superiore della confezione,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruit & herbal or Tisana difesa e sostegno?
Overall, Tisana difesa e sostegno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tisana difesa e sostegno has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tisana difesa e sostegno has less sugar: 0 g versus 7 g per 100 g.