Comparison

Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine vs Tartine réduit le cholestérol

Overall, Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT T...Tartine réduit le cholestéro...
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 315 kcal 358 kcal
Fat 35 g 40 g
Saturated fat 7.9 g 10 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives40
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has 12% fewer calories (315 kcal vs 358 kcal).
  • Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has 13% less fat (35 g vs 40 g).
  • Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has 21% less saturated fat (7.9 g vs 10 g).
  • Tartine réduit le cholestérol is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine

Eau, huiles végétales 31% (tournesol, lin, palme, colza, palmiste), esters de stérol végétal (9% dont 5,4% de stérols végétaux), amidon modifié, sel 0,7%, émulsifiants : mono-, diglycérides d'acides gras et lécithine de tournesol, poudre de babeurre (LAIT), conservateur : sorbate de potassium, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, arôme naturel, vitamines A et D, colorant : caroténoïdes.

Tartine réduit le cholestérol

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine or Tartine réduit le cholestérol?

Overall, Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fruit d'Or ProActiv EXPERT Tartine has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons