Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes vs Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines Herbes
Overall, Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines Herbes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fin... | Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 34.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 24.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has 10% less saturated fat (22 g vs 24.5 g).
- Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has 28% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has 22% more protein (9 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes
Lait (origine : France) et crème (origine : UE) pasteurisés, ail (1,4%), sel, fines herbes (1,2%), poivre. Fabriqué dans un atelier utilisant des fruits à coque et du lait de chèvre.
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines Herbes
Lait et crème pasteurisés (origine : France), ail et fines herbes (2,6%), sel, poivre, Peut contenir des fruits à coque,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes or Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines Herbes?
Overall, Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fromage à tartiner Ail & Fines herbes has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.