Comparison
Framboisier vs Framboisier 6 Parts
Overall, Framboisier 6 Parts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Framboisier | Framboisier 6 Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 257 kcal | 264 kcal |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 20.3 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Framboisier 6 Parts has 10% less saturated fat (8.1 g vs 9 g).
- Framboisier 6 Parts has 90% less sugar (2 g vs 20.3 g).
- Framboisier 6 Parts has 30% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Framboisier
Not available.
Framboisier 6 Parts
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Framboisier or Framboisier 6 Parts?
Overall, Framboisier 6 Parts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Framboisier has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Framboisier 6 Parts has less sugar: 2 g versus 20.3 g per 100 g.