Comparison
Fraisier vs Fraisier
Overall, Fraisier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fraisier | Fraisier |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 256 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fraisier has 27% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 256 kcal).
- Fraisier has 37% less fat (7.6 g vs 12 g).
- Fraisier has 26% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 6.6 g).
- Fraisier has 19% less sugar (17 g vs 21 g).
- Fraisier has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Fraisier has 29% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.4 g).
Ingredients
Fraisier
Not available.
Fraisier
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fraisier or Fraisier?
Overall, Fraisier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fraisier has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fraisier has less sugar: 17 g versus 21 g per 100 g.