Fontainebleau praline vs Pralines Roses Confiseur
Overall, Pralines Roses Confiseur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Fontainebleau praline
Pralines Roses Confiseur
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fontainebleau praline | Pralines Roses Confiseur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 488 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 59.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fontainebleau praline has 32% fewer calories (333 kcal vs 488 kcal).
- Pralines Roses Confiseur has 19% less fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- Pralines Roses Confiseur has 85% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 11 g).
- Fontainebleau praline has 70% less sugar (18 g vs 59.6 g).
- Pralines Roses Confiseur has 39% more protein (10 g vs 6.1 g).
- Only Pralines Roses Confiseur lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Fontainebleau praline
Crème (lait) 34 %, praliné amandes noisettes 33 % (sucre, amandes 8,2 %, noisettes 8,2 %, émulsifiant : lécithines), fromage frais (lait) 27 %, jus de citron concentré. Fabriqué dans un atelier utilisant des œufs, du gluten, du soja, des fruits à coque et des arachides.
Pralines Roses Confiseur
sucre, Amandes, sirop de glucose, agent d'enrobage: gomme arabique; colorant: carmin, beta carotene
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fontainebleau praline or Pralines Roses Confiseur?
Overall, Pralines Roses Confiseur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fontainebleau praline has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 488 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fontainebleau praline has less sugar: 18 g versus 59.6 g per 100 g.