Fonds pour Flammekueche vs Fond bio pour flammekueche
Overall, Fond bio pour flammekueche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fonds pour Flammekueche | Fond bio pour flammekueche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 279 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 7.3 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fond bio pour flammekueche has 28% less fat (4.8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Fond bio pour flammekueche has 52% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Fonds pour Flammekueche lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Fonds pour Flammekueche
Farine de blé (farine de blé, gluten de blé, , farine de blé malté), eau, huile de tournesol, sel, levure déactivée
Fond bio pour flammekueche
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fonds pour Flammekueche or Fond bio pour flammekueche?
Overall, Fond bio pour flammekueche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fond bio pour flammekueche has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fond bio pour flammekueche has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.