Foies de poulet confit vs Foie de poulet confit Bio
Overall, Foie de poulet confit Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Foies de poulet confit
Foie de poulet confit Bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Foies de poulet confit | Foie de poulet confit Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 9.6 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Foie de poulet confit Bio has 30% less fat (6.7 g vs 9.6 g).
- Foie de poulet confit Bio has 17% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Foie de poulet confit Bio has no sugar, while Foies de poulet confit has 0.5 g.
- Foie de poulet confit Bio has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Foie de poulet confit Bio has 24% more protein (25 g vs 19 g).
- Only Foie de poulet confit Bio lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Foies de poulet confit
Foies de poulet 82% (origine : France), graisse de canard , sel, arômes naturels, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, antioxydants : érythorbate de sodium, romarin.
Foie de poulet confit Bio
Foies de poulet* (origine : france), graisse de poulet*, sel, arôme naturel de poivre avec autres arômes naturels (contient gluten), conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Foies de poulet confit or Foie de poulet confit Bio?
Overall, Foie de poulet confit Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Foie de poulet confit Bio has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Foie de poulet confit Bio has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.