Flüssigsüße Stevia vs Dolcificante
Overall, Dolcificante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flüssigsüße Stevia | Dolcificante |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dolcificante has no calories, while Flüssigsüße Stevia has 6 kcal.
- Dolcificante has no sugar, while Flüssigsüße Stevia has 1.5 g.
- Dolcificante has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Flüssigsüße Stevia
Stevia liquide
Dolcificante
eritritolo, stevia
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flüssigsüße Stevia or Dolcificante?
Overall, Dolcificante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dolcificante has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 6 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dolcificante has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.