Fiordifrutta Pere vs Williamsbirnen-Fruchtaufstrich
Overall, Fiordifrutta Pere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fiordifrutta Pere | Williamsbirnen-Fruchtaufstri... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 196 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiordifrutta Pere has 26% fewer calories (145 kcal vs 196 kcal).
- Fiordifrutta Pere has 26% less sugar (34 g vs 46 g).
- Fiordifrutta Pere has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fiordifrutta Pere
Pere* 65%, succo di mela concentrato*, gelificante: pectina. *Biologico. Senza glutine. Conservare in luogo fresco e asciutto. Dopo l'apertura conservare in frigorifero alla temperatura di 4 °C e consumare entro pochi giorni.
Williamsbirnen-Fruchtaufstrich
Williamsbirnen (50%), Zucker, Geliermittel: Pektin, Zitronensaftkonzentrat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fiordifrutta Pere or Williamsbirnen-Fruchtaufstrich?
Overall, Fiordifrutta Pere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiordifrutta Pere has fewer calories: 145 kcal versus 196 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fiordifrutta Pere has less sugar: 34 g versus 46 g per 100 g.