Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches vs Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager
Overall, Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches
Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet mignon de dinde fermiè... | Filet mignon de dinde rôti a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 108 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has no sugar, while Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager has 0.8 g.
- Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches
Dinde
Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager
dinde origine : France, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, dextrose de blé, arômes naturels, arôme naturel d'ail avec d'autres arômes naturels, gélifiant: carraghénanes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches or Filet mignon de dinde rôti a partager?
Overall, Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has fewer calories: 108 kcal versus 110 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet mignon de dinde fermière en tranches has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.