Filet mignon de dinde vs Filet mignon dinde en émincés Thym Citron
Overall, Filet mignon de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet mignon de dinde | Filet mignon dinde en émincé... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet mignon de dinde has 16% more protein (25 g vs 21 g).
- Only Filet mignon de dinde lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Filet mignon de dinde
Filet mignon de dinde origine : France, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, dextrose de blé, arômes naturels, arôme naturel d'ail avec d'autres arômes naturels, gélifiant : carraghénanes. 102 g de filet mignon de dinde mis en œuvre pour 100 g de produit fini.
Filet mignon dinde en émincés Thym Citron
Dinde 87%, eau, conservateurs : lactate de potassium et acétates de sodium, maltodextrine, amidon modifié, sel et minéraux de mer (potassium, magnésium, calcium), épices et plantes aromatiques (dont thym feuille 0,14%), sucre, tomate, zeste de citron 0,17%, arômes naturels, jus de citron déshydraté 0,03%, extrait de citron 0,03%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet mignon de dinde or Filet mignon dinde en émincés Thym Citron?
Overall, Filet mignon de dinde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet mignon de dinde has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet mignon dinde en émincés Thym Citron has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.