Fawakih mchmach khokh vs Bifrutas tropical
Overall, Bifrutas tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fawakih mchmach khokh | Bifrutas tropical |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.4 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bifrutas tropical has 62% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 55 kcal).
- Bifrutas tropical has 54% less sugar (4.8 g vs 10.4 g).
- Fawakih mchmach khokh has 80% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.3 g).
- Bifrutas tropical has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bifrutas tropical lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Fawakih mchmach khokh
Not available.
Bifrutas tropical
Agua, leche desnatada (10%), zúmos de frutas a partir de concentrados (7%) (pina y mango), azucar, estabilizante pectina, aroma, acidulante acido citrico), vitaminas C, E y A, edulcorante sucralosa y colorante (E-160a i).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fawakih mchmach khokh or Bifrutas tropical?
Overall, Bifrutas tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bifrutas tropical has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 55 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bifrutas tropical has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.