Essentia vs Nativa 2
Overall, Essentia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Essentia | Nativa 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 494 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 23.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 40.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 11.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essentia has 88% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 494 kcal).
- Essentia has 86% less fat (3.3 g vs 23.6 g).
- Essentia has 39% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Essentia has 85% less sugar (6.2 g vs 40.5 g).
- Essentia has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Nativa 2 has 88% more protein (11.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Nativa 2 lists: Fish, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Essentia
Not available.
Nativa 2
_Leche_ desnatada, aceites vegetales (girasol alto oleico, nabina, girasol), dextrinomaltosa, _leche_ desnatada en polvo, _lactosa_, suero de _leche_ en polvo, sales minerales (citrato cálcico, citrato sódico, citrato potásico, citrato de magnesio, cloruro potásico, sulfato ferroso, sulfato de zinc, sulfato cúprico, sulfato de manganeso, fosfato potásico, yoduro potásico, seleniato sódico), aceite de _pescado_ (DHA), emulgente (lecitina de _soja_), vitaminas (C, E, B3, B5, B1, B2, A, B6, ácido fólico, K, D, biotina, B12), corrector de acidez (ácido cítrico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Essentia or Nativa 2?
Overall, Essentia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essentia has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 494 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Essentia has less sugar: 6.2 g versus 40.5 g per 100 g.