Comparison

Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial vs Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise

Overall, Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEscalope de veau milanaise,...Escalope de veau attendrie e...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 153 kcal 116 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.2 g
Protein 16 g 15.9 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has 24% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 153 kcal).
  • Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial has no sugar, while Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has 0.3 g.
  • Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise lists: Eggs, Gluten.

Ingredients

Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial

Not available.

Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise

Escalope de veau (63%), chapelure (farine de blé, levures, sel, paprika) (BLE), eau, amidon (BLE), œuf entier (OEUF), blanc d'œuf (OEUF), marinade (7%) : eau, sel, acidifiants lactate de potassium, acétate de potassium, arômes naturels, E301-E300.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial or Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise?

Overall, Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Escalope de veau attendrie et marinee milanaise has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Escalope de veau milanaise, format familial has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons