Ernst Richters Tisane vs Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio
Overall, Ernst Richters Tisane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Ernst Richters Tisane
Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ernst Richters Tisane | Divine digestion deux menthe... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 13.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ernst Richters Tisane has 96% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Ernst Richters Tisane has no fat, while Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio has 3.7 g.
- Ernst Richters Tisane has no sugar, while Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio has 6.4 g.
- Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio has 100% more fiber (13.5 g vs 0 g).
- Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio has 100% more protein (5.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Ernst Richters Tisane
Racine de rhubarbe, racine de réglisse, anis, feuille de menthe poivrée.
Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio
Menthe poivrée* (54%), graines de fenouil* (20%), menthe verte* (18%), racine de gingembre*. * ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ernst Richters Tisane or Divine digestion deux menthes et fenouil bio?
Overall, Ernst Richters Tisane has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ernst Richters Tisane has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ernst Richters Tisane has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.