Eismeergarnelen vs Eismeergarnelen
Overall, Eismeergarnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Eismeergarnelen | Eismeergarnelen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Garnelen | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Eismeergarnelen has 15% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Eismeergarnelen has 17% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Eismeergarnelen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Eismeergarnelen lists: Garnelen.
Ingredients
Eismeergarnelen
_Garnelen_ (Pandalus borealis), Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel (Essigsäure, Milchsäure).
Eismeergarnelen
GARNELEN, Wasser, Salz, Säuerungsmittel (E330) , Konservierungsstoffe (E202, E211)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eismeergarnelen or Eismeergarnelen?
Overall, Eismeergarnelen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eismeergarnelen has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eismeergarnelen has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.