Comparison

Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade vs Tobosines

Overall, Tobosines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEierlikör Weisser SchokoladeTobosines
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 543 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 31 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 18.5 g 3.5 g
Sugars 44 g 45 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 0 g
Protein 6.8 g 3.5 g
Additives35
AllergensMilk, SoybeansGluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tobosines has 36% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 543 kcal).
  • Tobosines has 88% less fat (3.6 g vs 31 g).
  • Tobosines has 81% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 18.5 g).
  • Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade has 100% more fiber (2.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade has 49% more protein (6.8 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Only Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade lists: Milk, Soybeans.
  • Only Tobosines lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

Ingredients

Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade

Zucker, Kakaobutter, 17,5% Eierlikör (enthält Farbstoff: Beta-Carotin), Vollmilchpulver, Magermilchpulver, Glukosesirup, Butterreinfett, Emulgator: Soja-Lecithine; Geliermittel: Agar-Agar; natürliches Aroma

Tobosines

Jarabe de glucosa-fructosa. harina de trigo. azúcar. agua. emulgente: E-471. acidulante: E-330. grasa vegetal (coco). aromas. colorantes: E-120. E-162. conservante: E-202. Contiene gluten y sulfitos

FAQ

Which is healthier: Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade or Tobosines?

Overall, Tobosines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tobosines has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Eierlikör Weisser Schokolade has less sugar: 44 g versus 45 g per 100 g.

More comparisons