Edulcorante Sacarina vs Edulcorante de mesa
Overall, Edulcorante Sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edulcorante Sacarina | Edulcorante de mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 3 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 5.1 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 3.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edulcorante Sacarina has 99% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- Edulcorante de mesa has no fat, while Edulcorante Sacarina has 0.8 g.
- Edulcorante Sacarina has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 5.1 g).
- Edulcorante Sacarina has 39% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.8 g).
Ingredients
Edulcorante Sacarina
Not available.
Edulcorante de mesa
Agente de recubrimiento (maltodextrina 89.6% (E1400)), edulcorantes (ciclamato de sodio 9.1% (E952ii), sacarina sódica 0.9% (E954ii)), regulador de acidez (citrato trisódico 0.4% (E331iii)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edulcorante Sacarina or Edulcorante de mesa?
Overall, Edulcorante Sacarina has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edulcorante Sacarina has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edulcorante Sacarina has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.