Comparison
Easter Friends vs ZzzQuil natura
Overall, ZzzQuil natura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Easter Friends | ZzzQuil natura |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 535 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 50.2 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ZzzQuil natura has 87% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 535 kcal).
- ZzzQuil natura has no fat, while Easter Friends has 31 g.
- ZzzQuil natura has no saturated fat, while Easter Friends has 17.2 g.
- ZzzQuil natura has 78% less sugar (11 g vs 50.2 g).
- Easter Friends has 84% more protein (6.3 g vs 1 g).
- ZzzQuil natura has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Easter Friends
Not available.
ZzzQuil natura
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Easter Friends or ZzzQuil natura?
Overall, ZzzQuil natura has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ZzzQuil natura has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 535 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
ZzzQuil natura has less sugar: 11 g versus 50.2 g per 100 g.