Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt vs Toblerone
Overall, Toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt
Toblerone
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade... | Toblerone |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 544 kcal | 528 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.5 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 46.5 g | 60 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Butterfat | Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Toblerone has 15% less fat (28 g vs 33 g).
- Toblerone has 13% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19.5 g).
- Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt has 23% less sugar (46.5 g vs 60 g).
- Toblerone has 73% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Toblerone has 100% more fiber (2.4 g vs 0 g).
- Only Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt lists: Butterfat.
- Only Toblerone lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt
Zucker, Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, Butterreinfett, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Chili-Extrakt, Aromen.
Toblerone
Zucker, Vollmilchpulver, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Honig (3,0%), Buttereinfett, Mandeln (1,6%), Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Eiklar, Aroma. Kakao:28% mindestens in der Milchschokolade
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt or Toblerone?
Overall, Toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Toblerone has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 544 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dunkle Schweizer Schokolade mit Chili-Extrakt has less sugar: 46.5 g versus 60 g per 100 g.