Comparison

DOLCE GUSTO espresso vs Capsules Mars imp

Overall, DOLCE GUSTO espresso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDOLCE GUSTO espressoCapsules Mars imp
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 1 kcal 419 kcal
Fat 0 g 11 g
Saturated fat 0 g 9.8 g
Sugars 0 g 66 g
Salt 0 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 3.6 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk, Malt d'orge, Proteines de lait

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso has 100% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 419 kcal).
  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso has no fat, while Capsules Mars imp has 11 g.
  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso has no saturated fat, while Capsules Mars imp has 9.8 g.
  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso has no sugar, while Capsules Mars imp has 66 g.
  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso has no salt, while Capsules Mars imp has 1.5 g.
  • Capsules Mars imp has 100% more protein (3.6 g vs 0 g).
  • DOLCE GUSTO espresso is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Capsules Mars imp lists: Gluten, Milk, Malt d'orge, Proteines de lait.

Ingredients

DOLCE GUSTO espresso

Café.

Capsules Mars imp

Sucre, cacao maigre en poudre (11 %). huile de coprah, extrait de malt d'orge, sirop de glucose stabilisants (E412, E466, E340, E4521), arômes, antiagglomérant (E551), sel pauvre en sodium (sel marin, chlorure de potassium sulfate de magnésium), sel, proteines de lait, émulsifiant (E471)

FAQ

Which is healthier: DOLCE GUSTO espresso or Capsules Mars imp?

Overall, DOLCE GUSTO espresso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

DOLCE GUSTO espresso has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

DOLCE GUSTO espresso has less sugar: 0 g versus 66 g per 100 g.

More comparisons