Desperados Original aguardiente vs Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Desperados Original aguardiente
Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Desperados Original aguardie... | Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% co... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón has 53% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 57 kcal).
- Desperados Original aguardiente has 59% less sugar (2.3 g vs 5.6 g).
Ingredients
Desperados Original aguardiente
Eau, malt d'orge, maïs, sirop de glucose, sucre, extraits de houblon, spiritueux à base d'agave (0,1%), arômes naturels, acidifiant : acide citrique. Brassée : France.
Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón
Agua, 45% cerveza sin alcohol 0.0 (agua, malta de CEBADA, lúpulo, extracto de lúpulo y aroma), azúcar, zumos de limón (2,6%) naranja, lima y acerola, a partir de concentrados, extracto de limón concentrado, aroma cítrico natural con otros aromas naturales, estabilizante E-410.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Desperados Original aguardiente or Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cerveza rubia Radler 0,0% con zumo natural de limón has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Desperados Original aguardiente has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.