Comparison

Deluxe Chocoladeletter Wit vs Chocoladeletter melk

Overall, Chocoladeletter melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDeluxe Chocoladeletter WitChocoladeletter melk
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 525 kcal 533 kcal
Fat 27 g 30.5 g
Saturated fat 17 g 18.3 g
Sugars 65 g 55.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 3.1 g
Protein 4.6 g 5.8 g
Additives110
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Deluxe Chocoladeletter Wit has 11% less fat (27 g vs 30.5 g).
  • Chocoladeletter melk has 14% less sugar (55.6 g vs 65 g).
  • Chocoladeletter melk has 84% more fiber (3.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Chocoladeletter melk has 21% more protein (5.8 g vs 4.6 g).

Ingredients

Deluxe Chocoladeletter Wit

Suiker, cacaoboter, volle melkpoeder, gekleurde confetti (8%) [suiker, plantaardige oliën (palm, kokos), rijstzetmeel, cacaopoeder, kleurstoffen (E100, E141, E160a, E162, E163), glansmiddelen (E901, E903, E904), emulgatoren (E322, E492), glucosestroop, verdikkingsmiddel (E414), vanille extract], weipoeder (melk), lactose (melk), magere melkpoeder, cacaomassa, emulgator (E322 (soja)), aroma, natuurlijk vanille aroma. Gemaakt in een bedrijf waar ook noten en glutenhoudende granen worden verwerkt.

Chocoladeletter melk

Suiker, cacaoboter, cacaomassa, volle MELKpoeder, emulgator: SOJAlecithine, natuurlijk vanille-aroma.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Deluxe Chocoladeletter Wit or Chocoladeletter melk?

Overall, Chocoladeletter melk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Deluxe Chocoladeletter Wit has fewer calories: 525 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocoladeletter melk has less sugar: 55.6 g versus 65 g per 100 g.

More comparisons