Delikatess Leberwurst vs Herkku-Maksamakkara
Overall, Herkku-Maksamakkara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Delikatess Leberwurst | Herkku-Maksamakkara |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 296 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.2 g | 9.8 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Herkku-Maksamakkara has 17% fewer calories (296 kcal vs 358 kcal).
- Herkku-Maksamakkara has 27% less fat (24 g vs 33 g).
- Herkku-Maksamakkara has 26% less saturated fat (9.8 g vs 13.2 g).
- Delikatess Leberwurst has 44% less sugar (2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Herkku-Maksamakkara has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Delikatess Leberwurst
Not available.
Herkku-Maksamakkara
Lihaliemi (vesi, porsaanluu, porsaanliha, sipuli, mausteet (mustapippuri, maustepippuri, laakerinlehti)), porsaanliha (26 %) (alkuperä Suomi), porsaanmaksa (26 %) (alkuperä Suomi), silava, sokeri, suola, porsaan sidekudosproteiini, mausteet (sipuli, inkivääri), mausteuutteet (mustapippuri, muskottipähkinä), vanilliiniaromi, sikaproteiini, glukoosi, hapettumisenestoaineet (E300, E306), säilöntäaine (E250). Lihapitoisuus 26 %. Lihaa ja muita lihaan verrattavia raaka-aineita 64 %.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Delikatess Leberwurst or Herkku-Maksamakkara?
Overall, Herkku-Maksamakkara has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Herkku-Maksamakkara has fewer calories: 296 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Delikatess Leberwurst has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.