Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic vs Caviar de tomates séchées
Overall, Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Délice de tomates sechées au... | Caviar de tomates séchées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 217 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 15.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 7.4 g | 8.3 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 5.8 g | — |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caviar de tomates séchées has 13% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has 19% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has 11% less sugar (7.4 g vs 8.3 g).
- Caviar de tomates séchées has 23% less salt (3 g vs 3.9 g).
- Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has 35% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.4 g).
- Only Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic
Tomates séchées 34.7% (tomates, sel), eau, pulpe de tomates, huile de colza, vinaigre de vin rouge, huile d'olive vierge extra, basilic 1,6%, aromate, ail. CONTIENT DES SULFITES.
Caviar de tomates séchées
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic or Caviar de tomates séchées?
Overall, Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caviar de tomates séchées has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Délice de tomates sechées au Basilic has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.