Comparison

Dark chocolate cranberries vs Sweet bites - Cranberry

Overall, Sweet bites - Cranberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark chocolate cranberriesSweet bites - Cranberry
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 459 kcal 446 kcal
Fat 20 g 19.2 g
Saturated fat 12.1 g 11.4 g
Sugars 58.9 g 56.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.2 g 7.4 g
Protein 2.8 g 3.4 g
Additives46
AllergensMilkMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sweet bites - Cranberry has 57% more fiber (7.4 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Sweet bites - Cranberry has 18% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Only Sweet bites - Cranberry lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Dark chocolate cranberries

Dark chocolate coating (65%) (Sugar, Cocoa mass, Palm oil, Cocoa butter, Whey powder (Milk), Emulsifier: Sunflower lecithin; Glazing agents: Shellac, Gum arabic), Dried sweetened cranberries (35%) (Sugar, Cranberries, Sunflower oil).

Sweet bites - Cranberry

chocolat noir 59% [pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, matières grasses _laitières_ anhydres, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme naturel de vanille], sucre, canneberges 16%, huiles végétales partiellement hydrogénées (tournesol, coco), amidon modifié de tapioca, sirop de glucose, agent d'enrobage (shellac), émulsifiant (lécithine de tournesol), acidifiant (acide citrique), conservateur (acide sorbique).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark chocolate cranberries or Sweet bites - Cranberry?

Overall, Sweet bites - Cranberry has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sweet bites - Cranberry has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sweet bites - Cranberry has less sugar: 56.2 g versus 58.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons