Comparison

Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail vs Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCroûtons l'Original - saveur...Croûtons ronds frits pour so...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 538 kcal 528 kcal
Fat 32 g 30 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 2.6 g
Sugars 1.4 g 3.8 g
Salt 1.6 g 2.1 g
Fiber 2.5 g 3.3 g
Protein 8.5 g 7.8 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g has 21% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail has 63% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail has 24% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g has 24% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail

Farine de blé (63%), huile de tournesol (31%), arôme naturel d'ail, arômes naturels, gluten de blé, sel, levure, fibre de blé, minéraux (citrate de potassium, chlorure de potassium, bicarbonate de sodium).

Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g

Farine de BLE, huile de tournesol, arôme naturel d'ail, GLUTEN DE BLE, farine de BLE MALTÉ, sel, levure. traces éventuelles de lait, de fruits à coque, de graines de sésame et de soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail or Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croûtons ronds frits pour soupe saveur ail 2x90g - 180g has fewer calories: 528 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croûtons l'Original - saveur ail has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons