Comparison

Crousti pom vs Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko

Overall, Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrousti pomŠnek Bob pochoutka jablko
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 352 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 75 g 38.4 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 11.8 g 3.2 g
Protein 1.9 g 1.1 g
Additives20
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has 47% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has 39% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has 83% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has 49% less sugar (38.4 g vs 75 g).
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has no salt, while Crousti pom has 0.3 g.
  • Crousti pom has 73% more fiber (11.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Crousti pom has 42% more protein (1.9 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Crousti pom lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Crousti pom

Pommes 94 %, sucre, huile de tournesol, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : METABISULFITE de sodium, arôme naturel, METABISULFITE

Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko

Alma 100%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crousti pom or Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko?

Overall, Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Šnek Bob pochoutka jablko has less sugar: 38.4 g versus 75 g per 100 g.

More comparisons