Comparison

Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates vs Cereali

Overall, Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrisp hazelnut and milk choc...Cereali
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 603 kcal 561 kcal
Fat 42.7 g 33.8 g
Saturated fat 14.1 g 21.9 g
Sugars 39.9 g 49.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Protein 8.2 g 8.6 g
Additives11
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cereali has 21% less fat (33.8 g vs 42.7 g).
  • Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates has 36% less saturated fat (14.1 g vs 21.9 g).
  • Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates has 19% less sugar (39.9 g vs 49.1 g).
  • Only Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates

milk chocolate 30% (sugar, cocoa butter, cocoa paste, skimmed milk powder, concentrated butter, emulsifiers : lecithins [ soy ], vanillin), hazelnuts 28,5 per cent, sugar, palm oil, wheat flour , whey powder, lean cocoa, emulsifiers : lecithins [ soy ], baking powder : carbonate sodium acid, salt, vanillin

Cereali

higher milk chocolate 33,5% (sugar, cocoa butter, milk powder, cocoa paste, emulsifiers: lecithins [soy], vanillin), sugar, skimmed milk powder, palm oil, concentrated butter, barley, rice, wheat, epe, emulsifiers: lecithins [soy], buckwheat, vanillin

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates or Cereali?

Overall, Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cereali has fewer calories: 561 kcal versus 603 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crisp hazelnut and milk chocolates has less sugar: 39.9 g versus 49.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons