Comparison

Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC vs Eismeergarnelen

Overall, Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrevettes Nordiques décortiq...Eismeergarnelen
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 66 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 2.2 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 17 g
Additives02
AllergensCrustaceans, FishCrustaceans, Garnelen

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has 22% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 85 kcal).
  • Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has 36% less fat (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Eismeergarnelen has no sugar, while Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has 0.5 g.
  • Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Eismeergarnelen has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
  • Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC lists: Fish.
  • Only Eismeergarnelen lists: Garnelen.

Ingredients

Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC

CREVETTES nordiques (Pandalus borealis) 98,5%, sel.

Eismeergarnelen

_Garnelen_ (Pandalus borealis), Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel (Essigsäure, Milchsäure).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC or Eismeergarnelen?

Overall, Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Crevettes Nordiques décortiquées cuites MSC has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Eismeergarnelen has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons