Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere vs MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1 (x16) 295g
Overall, Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere
MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1 (x16) 295g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Craquotant x2 sous atmospher... | MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 429 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 15 g |
| Sugars | 23 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans, Et produits à base de ces céréales, Noisettes (Corylus avellana) | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has 11% fewer calories (383 kcal vs 429 kcal).
- Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has 27% less saturated fat (11 g vs 15 g).
- MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1 (x16) 295g has 10% more protein (6.7 g vs 6 g).
- Only Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans, Et produits à base de ces céréales, Noisettes (Corylus avellana).
Ingredients
Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere
Crème de lait 17%, eau, chocolat noir 16% (pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao), œufs, sucre, huile de pépins de raisin, brisures de crêpes croustillantes au beurre (farine de blé, sucre, beurre concentré, lait écrémé en poudre, malt d'orge, sel), pâte de noisettes 3,5%, blancs d'œufs, lait entier en poudre, farine de blé, praliné 2,5% (pâte de noisettes 1,3%, sucre, huile de noisettes, émulsifiant (E322)), noisettes brutes en poudre 2%, cacao maigre en poudre, beurre de cacao, amidon, gélifiant (E440), stabilisant (E407, E412, E415)Présence éventuelle : soja, autres fruits à coque
MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1 (x16) 295g
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere or MINIS PATISSERIES PLATEAU 1 (x16) 295g?
Overall, Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 429 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Craquotant x2 sous atmosphere has less sugar: 23 g versus 25 g per 100 g.