Covrigi de Buzău vs Covrigei Chimen & Sare
Overall, Covrigei Chimen & Sare has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Covrigi de Buzău | Covrigei Chimen & Sare |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 382 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 8.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Covrigei Chimen & Sare has 26% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Covrigi de Buzău has 15% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Covrigei Chimen & Sare has 100% more fiber (5 g vs 0 g).
- Covrigei Chimen & Sare has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Covrigi de Buzău
Not available.
Covrigei Chimen & Sare
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Covrigi de Buzău or Covrigei Chimen & Sare?
Overall, Covrigei Chimen & Sare has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Covrigei Chimen & Sare has fewer calories: 382 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Covrigei Chimen & Sare has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.