Comparison
Côtes du Rhône - 2018 vs Côtes du Rhône
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes du Rhône - 2018 | Côtes du Rhône |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côtes du Rhône has 85% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Côtes du Rhône has 96% less sugar (0.6 g vs 15.5 g).
- Côtes du Rhône - 2018 has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
- Côtes du Rhône - 2018 has 90% more protein (0.7 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Côtes du Rhône - 2018
raisin
Côtes du Rhône
Vin rouge. Contient des _sulfites_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes du Rhône - 2018 or Côtes du Rhône?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côtes du Rhône has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes du Rhône has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.