Comparison
Côtes de Rhône vs Côtes du Rhône
Overall, Côtes du Rhône has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Côtes de Rhône | Côtes du Rhône |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côtes du Rhône has no calories, while Côtes de Rhône has 11 kcal.
- Côtes du Rhône has no sugar, while Côtes de Rhône has 0.6 g.
- Only Côtes de Rhône lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Côtes de Rhône
Vin rouge sec
Côtes du Rhône
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de Rhône or Côtes du Rhône?
Overall, Côtes du Rhône has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côtes du Rhône has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes du Rhône has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.