Comparison

Costa Brava Salsa Picante vs Salsa brava

Overall, Costa Brava Salsa Picante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCosta Brava Salsa PicanteSalsa brava
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 26 kcal 271 kcal
Fat 2 g 26 g
Saturated fat 0 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0 g 3.6 g
Salt 2 g 1.9 g
Fiber 3 g 0.3 g
Protein 2 g 0.9 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedEggs, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has 90% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 271 kcal).
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has 92% less fat (2 g vs 26 g).
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has no saturated fat, while Salsa brava has 2.1 g.
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has no sugar, while Salsa brava has 3.6 g.
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has 90% more fiber (3 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has 55% more protein (2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Costa Brava Salsa Picante has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Salsa brava lists: Eggs, Mustard.

Ingredients

Costa Brava Salsa Picante

Not available.

Salsa brava

Agua, aceite de nabina 25%, puré de tomate 8.7%, vinagre de alcohol, almidón modificado, sambal oelek (chile, agua, sal, vinagre de alcohol, almidón modificado), azúcar, yema de _huevo_, mostaza (agua, semillas de _mostaza_, vinagre de alcohol, sal, aromas, especias), sal, pimiento rojo, ajo, extracto de levadura, chile, extracto de pimentón.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Costa Brava Salsa Picante or Salsa brava?

Overall, Costa Brava Salsa Picante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Costa Brava Salsa Picante has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Costa Brava Salsa Picante has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons