Cortado Marcilla vs Café long intense Tassimo
Overall, Café long intense Tassimo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Cortado Marcilla
Café long intense Tassimo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cortado Marcilla | Café long intense Tassimo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 19.8 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Café long intense Tassimo has 98% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 40 kcal).
- Café long intense Tassimo has no fat, while Cortado Marcilla has 1.1 g.
- Café long intense Tassimo has no saturated fat, while Cortado Marcilla has 1.1 g.
- Café long intense Tassimo has no sugar, while Cortado Marcilla has 3.9 g.
- Café long intense Tassimo has 98% more fiber (19.8 g vs 0.4 g).
- Cortado Marcilla has 86% more protein (1.4 g vs 0.2 g).
- Café long intense Tassimo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cortado Marcilla lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Cortado Marcilla
_Leche_ desnatada en polvo 32%, azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, café soluble 15%, grasa de coco totalmente hidrogenada, proteínas de _leche_, estabilizante (E340), antiaglomerante (E551), emulgentes (E471, E433).
Café long intense Tassimo
Café moulu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cortado Marcilla or Café long intense Tassimo?
Overall, Café long intense Tassimo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Café long intense Tassimo has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 40 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Café long intense Tassimo has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.