Comparison
Corona Extra vs Pure Malt Lager
Overall, Corona Extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Corona Extra | Pure Malt Lager |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pure Malt Lager has 50% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Corona Extra has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Corona Extra is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Corona Extra
Water, malt, unroasted maize, hop extract.
Pure Malt Lager
agua, malta de cebada, aroma natural, extracto de lúpulo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Corona Extra or Pure Malt Lager?
Overall, Corona Extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pure Malt Lager has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Corona Extra has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.