Corne de gazelle par 3 vs Mini cornes de gazelle
Overall, Corne de gazelle par 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Corne de gazelle par 3 | Mini cornes de gazelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 511 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Fat | 42 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 12.4 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.6 g | — |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mini cornes de gazelle has 45% less fat (23 g vs 42 g).
- Corne de gazelle par 3 has 50% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 6.8 g).
- Corne de gazelle par 3 has 44% less sugar (12.4 g vs 22 g).
- Corne de gazelle par 3 has 31% more protein (17.3 g vs 12 g).
- Corne de gazelle par 3 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Corne de gazelle par 3 lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Corne de gazelle par 3
Amandes, farine, sucre, huile végétale, œufs, eau de fleur d'oranger.
Mini cornes de gazelle
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Corne de gazelle par 3 or Mini cornes de gazelle?
Overall, Corne de gazelle par 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini cornes de gazelle has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 511 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Corne de gazelle par 3 has less sugar: 12.4 g versus 22 g per 100 g.