Comparison
Coquelet vs Coquelet
Overall, Coquelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coquelet | Coquelet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 149 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coquelet has 38% less fat (4.5 g vs 7.2 g).
- Coquelet has 33% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Coquelet has 89% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Coquelet
Not available.
Coquelet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coquelet or Coquelet?
Overall, Coquelet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coquelet has fewer calories: 149 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coquelet has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.