Coq au vin de bergerac vs Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011
Overall, Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Coq au vin de bergerac
Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coq au vin de bergerac | Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 20... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has no calories, while Coq au vin de bergerac has 107 kcal.
- Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has no fat, while Coq au vin de bergerac has 6.3 g.
- Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has no sugar, while Coq au vin de bergerac has 0.6 g.
- Coq au vin de bergerac has 100% more protein (10 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Coq au vin de bergerac
Not available.
Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011
100 % vin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coq au vin de bergerac or Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011?
Overall, Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chateau La Vaure Bergerac 2011 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.