Confiture orange amere vs Fruchtgarten Bitterorange
Overall, Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Confiture orange amere
Fruchtgarten Bitterorange
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Confiture orange amere | Fruchtgarten Bitterorange |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 221 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 53 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has 48% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 221 kcal).
- Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has no saturated fat, while Confiture orange amere has 0.5 g.
- Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has 53% less sugar (25 g vs 53 g).
- Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Confiture orange amere
Not available.
Fruchtgarten Bitterorange
Bitterorangen mit Schale* 70 %, Agavendicksaft", Rohrohrzucker*, Geliermittel Pektine, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*. "aus kontrolliert-biologischem Anbau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Confiture orange amere or Fruchtgarten Bitterorange?
Overall, Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 221 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruchtgarten Bitterorange has less sugar: 25 g versus 53 g per 100 g.