Confettura di rose vs Różana rozkosz
Overall, Confettura di rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Confettura di rose | Różana rozkosz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 248 kcal | 276 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 59 g | 69 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Confettura di rose has 10% fewer calories (248 kcal vs 276 kcal).
- Confettura di rose has 14% less sugar (59 g vs 69 g).
- Różana rozkosz is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Confettura di rose
ЦВЯТ ОТ МАСЛОДАЙНА РОЗА (ROSA DAMASCENA) - 40%, ГЛЮКОЗО – ФРУКТОЗЕН СИРОП, ЗАХАР, ЖЕЛИРАЩ АГЕНТ - ПЕКТИН, РЕГУЛАТОР НА КИСЕЛИННОСТ: ЛИМОНЕНА КИСЕЛИНА
Różana rozkosz
Cukier, płatki róży (30%), sok z cytryny. Może zawierać gluten i gorczycę.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Confettura di rose or Różana rozkosz?
Overall, Confettura di rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Confettura di rose has fewer calories: 248 kcal versus 276 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Confettura di rose has less sugar: 59 g versus 69 g per 100 g.