Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L vs Énergie Chérie
Overall, Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Concentré à diluer citron -... | Énergie Chérie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 51 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 10.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has 96% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 51 kcal).
- Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 10.2 g).
- Énergie Chérie has 66% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has the better Nutri-Score.
- Énergie Chérie is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L
Eau, jus de citron à base de concentré 36,6%, pulpes de citron 5,1%, jus d'orange à base de concentré 3,8%, acidifiant : acide citrique, arôme naturel de citron.
Énergie Chérie
pommes (84%), raisins blancs , framboises (3,2%), cerises (3,2%), fruit de la passion , betterave , citron vert, quelques vitamines (B1, B2, B6, C, E et niacine) , guarana (0,02%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L or Énergie Chérie?
Overall, Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 51 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Concentré à diluer citron - bouteille 1L has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 10.2 g per 100 g.