Comparison

Concentrated Chicken Broth vs Chicken stock pots

Overall, Chicken stock pots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConcentrated Chicken BrothChicken stock pots
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 17 kcal 5 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 1.7 g 0.5 g
Additives14
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken stock pots has 70% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 17 kcal).
  • Concentrated Chicken Broth has no fat, while Chicken stock pots has 0.5 g.
  • Chicken stock pots has 70% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Chicken stock pots has 24% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Concentrated Chicken Broth has 70% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Concentrated Chicken Broth lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Concentrated Chicken Broth

chicken broth (water, chicken stock), yeast extract, salt, sugars (dextrose), canola or soybean oil, sunflower oil, carnauba wax, natural ingredients: bouillon de poulet (eau

Chicken stock pots

Water, Salt, Sunflower Oil, Flavourings, Sugar, Chicken Fat (2%), Yeast Extract, Gelling Agents (Xanthan Gum, Agar), Dried Chicken (1%), Colour (Plain Caramel), Dehydrated Vegetables [Carrots, Leek], Spices, Antioxidant (Extracts of Rosemary). May contain milk, wheat and celery. NO ARTIFICIAL COLOURS, FLAVOURS OR HYDROGENATED FAT.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Concentrated Chicken Broth or Chicken stock pots?

Overall, Chicken stock pots has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken stock pots has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 17 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken stock pots has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons