Comino Comarrico Molido vs Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr
Overall, Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Comino Comarrico Molido
Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Comino Comarrico Molido | Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Kn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr has 58% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 9 kcal).
- Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr has 42% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Comino Comarrico Molido has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Comino Comarrico Molido
Not available.
Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Comino Comarrico Molido or Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr?
Overall, Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldo De Gallina 36 Cubos Knorr has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 9 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Comino Comarrico Molido has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.