Coca cola vs Fanta portocale 2l
Overall, Coca cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coca cola | Fanta portocale 2l |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.6 g | 10.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Coca cola
water, sugar, carbon dioxide, colorant e 150d, phosphoric acid, natural flavors, caffeine flavor,
Fanta portocale 2l
Water, sugar, fruit syrup, orange concentrate (5%), carbon dioxide, citric acid, natural orange flavor with other flavors, ascorbic acid, coloring carotenes, guar gum stabilizer.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coca cola or Fanta portocale 2l?
Overall, Coca cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coca cola has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fanta portocale 2l has less sugar: 10.5 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.