Comparison

Coca Cola vs Coca-Cola sans sucres

Overall, Coca-Cola sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoca ColaCoca-Cola sans sucres
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 42 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 10.6 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives36
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coca-Cola sans sucres has 99% fewer calories (0 kcal vs 42 kcal).
  • Coca-Cola sans sucres has no sugar, while Coca Cola has 10.6 g.
  • Coca-Cola sans sucres has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Coca Cola

water, fructose-glucose syrup, carbon dioxide, colour: e 150d, acid: phosphoric acid, natural flavourings, flavouring caffeine

Coca-Cola sans sucres

Eau gazeifiée; colorant: E150d; acidifiant: acide phosphorique; édulcorants: aspartame, acésulfame-K, glycosides de stéviol produits par voie enzymatique; aromes naturels; arôme caféine; correcteur d'acidité: citrates de Sodium

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coca Cola or Coca-Cola sans sucres?

Overall, Coca-Cola sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coca-Cola sans sucres has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coca-Cola sans sucres has less sugar: 0 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons