Cinnamon Hoops vs Focuswater pink ribbon edition
Overall, Focuswater pink ribbon edition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinnamon Hoops | Focuswater pink ribbon editi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Focuswater pink ribbon edition has 96% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Focuswater pink ribbon edition has no fat, while Cinnamon Hoops has 1.4 g.
- Focuswater pink ribbon edition has 76% less sugar (4 g vs 17 g).
- Focuswater pink ribbon edition has no salt, while Cinnamon Hoops has 0.6 g.
- Cinnamon Hoops has 100% more protein (4.9 g vs 0 g).
- Focuswater pink ribbon edition has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cinnamon Hoops is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cinnamon Hoops
Kukuřičná mouka* 75 %, cukr*, sůl, skořice* 0,5%.
Focuswater pink ribbon edition
Eau, sirop de fructose, 4% jus de fruits à base de concentré (citron, mirabelle 1%, rhubarbe 1%), arômes naturels, vitamines (B3, B5, B6, B7, D), concentré colorant de patate douce, acidifiant (acide citrique), extrait de thé vert
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinnamon Hoops or Focuswater pink ribbon edition?
Overall, Focuswater pink ribbon edition has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Focuswater pink ribbon edition has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Focuswater pink ribbon edition has less sugar: 4 g versus 17 g per 100 g.