Cidre Bio Brut (5%) vs Saft vom Fass
Overall, Saft vom Fass has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cidre Bio Brut (5%) | Saft vom Fass |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 10.1 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | — |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saft vom Fass has 63% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 49 kcal).
- Saft vom Fass has 58% less sugar (4.2 g vs 10.1 g).
- Only Cidre Bio Brut (5%) lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Cidre Bio Brut (5%)
Pur jus de pommes à cidre bio. Contient des _sulfites_.
Saft vom Fass
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cidre Bio Brut (5%) or Saft vom Fass?
Overall, Saft vom Fass has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saft vom Fass has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saft vom Fass has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 10.1 g per 100 g.