Comparison

Cidre Bio Brut (5%) vs Saft vom Fass

Overall, Saft vom Fass has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCidre Bio Brut (5%)Saft vom Fass
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 49 kcal 18 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 10.1 g 4.2 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 0.3 g 0.1 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saft vom Fass has 63% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 49 kcal).
  • Saft vom Fass has 58% less sugar (4.2 g vs 10.1 g).
  • Only Cidre Bio Brut (5%) lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Cidre Bio Brut (5%)

Pur jus de pommes à cidre bio. Contient des _sulfites_.

Saft vom Fass

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cidre Bio Brut (5%) or Saft vom Fass?

Overall, Saft vom Fass has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saft vom Fass has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saft vom Fass has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 10.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons